![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: make icon collages, osx icon pack, vector web icons, make your own aim buddy icon, os iconThe chemical theory, similar with created in a XIX-th century and used in the modernMedical researches. In the organisation of the western science almost there were no elements hierarchical Managements, short of relations between the separate scientist and its pupils, Assistants and students. The scientific community successfully functioned without Hierarchies it is simple because organizational authorities, which usually Are delegated to advantage of hierarchy, in a science it is better to keep not delegated. Dividing the general aspiration to true, confirmed supervision, Experiment and reasoning to explanations of the natural phenomena, scientists Choose the branch of a science most suitable to them personally - and they it is serious Would oppose attempt to transfer the right of this choice of any hierarchy. Out of Any administrative structure an individual choice of each scientist Participated in development of system of professional specialisation and effective Divisions of labour. In the similar image separate scientists planned own work, and Results were not worse because that no hierarchy supervised Direction of works, the cost of time and material resources. In a science acted Without delay not monetary, but intellectual stimulus - approval or blame Deeply esteemed activity aimed at disclosing of secrets and riddles The nature. The hierarchy could not manipulate these stimulus. The permission Professional conflicts was simultaneously process of an establishment of the consent; Any scientist of own will would disagree to transfer to bureaucrats the right To allow scientific disputes. As a whole it is clear that efficiency of the western community Scientists it was defined just by absence of administrative hierarchy. Where The hierarchy, there results has prevailed have appeared shameful for a science, and it Perhaps, it would not be possible to the hierarchical organisation of fundamental sciences To avoid "if research were financed from one source. The fundamental science is commercially unpromising and cannot support itself ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|