 |
|
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
|
 | ||||||||
|
 |
 |
|
 Close Icon |
|
Add Close icon to cartImage sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16
File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO
Purchase entire Toolbar Icon Set now! View Toolbar Icon Set now!
Download demo icons
Tags: free png icons, bar and icons disapear, adding icons to task bar, funny little icons, kde change icon
Arguments against to give to Jim a compensatory holidayThe chief-logician: «I should not take the nobody's part. I am not for this purpose put to supervise, that me liked: I here to make decisions and to observe interests of the company. And I know that if Jim will a little be afflicted, soon it again will settle into shape, and I thereby will manage to support labour productivity. And if I give it a compensatory holiday all will start to ask compensatory holidays and then here there will be nobody to work. I have not the right to give someone one compensatory holiday while all the others should be on job».
The chief-etik: «It is remembered, when I only started to work, my boss has not complied my personal request. I was malicious, and it seemed to me that at job to me anybody does not have affairs. But when I in all have understood, have understood that the chief has made in that situation the optimum decision and actually it has shown about me care. So Jim should understand: as it is unpleasant to me to it to refuse, I do it for general welfare».
Let resulted above a reasoning do not force you to consider, as if any separate logicians or ethics cannot accept decisions. As well as all other people, they can be very resolute — or the extremely irresolute. In a difficult situation it is required to make the decision in the deadlines, otherwise the problem risks to get out of hand. The main thing here — decision-making process, and as it is easy to note, in the example resulted above the chief-logician was objective and impartial, while the chief-etik has plunged into emotional aspect of a situation. Both of them felt, thought and showed care, however to the same decisions they came absolutely different ways. But is much more often it appears so that one participant of a situation does not understand another and then both can make a widespread error — to start to be upset and take offence.
As it has already been noted in the second chapter, the pair «logic — ethics» is unique of pairs of the preferences, finding out a close connection with a sex of person. During short time as men, and women can be fascinated by dissimilarity of the person of an opposite sex: contrasts are really drawn — but only for short time. Finally logiko-ethical disagreements can become a principal cause of problems in dialogue (both business, and personal). Both in business, and in private life it appears so: the woman to whom logic style of decision-making (the type of behaviour unconditionally approved at men) is peculiar, will receive the most unflattering epithets, no less than the man with ethical style of decision-making. As the standard installation says, "real man" does not show the feelings; hence, as to the present woman it cannot make "rigid" decisions as for this purpose should renounce personal feelings. Certainly, both these statements are simply incorrect.
Copyright © 2006-2012 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved.
|
More info
